October 2006 Archives

What is web 2.0?

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
  • Digg it!
  • Add to Del.Icio.Us
  • Add to Technorati
  • NewsVine
  • Furl
  • Slashdot
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • Facebook
  • Blink It
  • Mixx
  • Add this post to Reddit
  • Simpy
  • Spurl

Web 2.0 is what the web was originally designed for, yet, few at its genesis (Web 1.0) had the patience to invest in a vision that needed time to mature. Now, Web 1.0 has been turned upside down and the patient Web 2.0 programmer is beaming. If you are a consumer and need working, stable, secure website, it is time to harvest. 

I was in a meeting several years ago with a Microsoft developer and he was concerned open source code was a security problem because it was "open".  The term "open" does not refer to security, but rather open to peer review and updates. Proficiency and innovation is key if you want security, stability, and reliability. 

Think of the web as publishing vehicle, another step in our communication evolution. The web itself is the pathway through which data is transmitted and HTML is the way it is displayed so that we can see it. What was needed was better automation (engineering) of the web page, its creation, dissemination, flexibility, and searchability. The engine that you put on this pathway has got to get a lot of mileage in a wide variety and changing environments. Web 2.0 achieves this goal. 

By configuring web pages using XML and css transforms the content throughout a site and on the web. Clients love it, we love it, and even better we adore other Web 2.0 companies. Why, you ask?

The answer is that Web 2.0 has evolved the web in other ways as well. Better compliance in name space and documentation means that web applications are no longer operating in a vacuum (and can hide their security vulnerabilities).  Solutions for clients have only multiplied, better integration with any web 2.0 compliant system means better security, content management, and flexibility.

It is all part of the process of engineering the communication age--and like any science the more contributions the better it will be.

Unix Universe

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
  • Digg it!
  • Add to Del.Icio.Us
  • Add to Technorati
  • NewsVine
  • Furl
  • Slashdot
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • Facebook
  • Blink It
  • Mixx
  • Add this post to Reddit
  • Simpy
  • Spurl
Servers, I have learned, are equivalent to picking out a car. Fast, stable, slow, not-secure, too secure, robust, etc. Within this category, you can chose different flavors-some are type-specific, others are cute, some idiot proof, others are plain ugly. In all cases, what server and server flavor you choose says a lot about you as a person. 

So, when ICI began in 2000, when I said we use "Unix", eyes blinked. It was easy to sense that people scoffed at me. Apparently, Unix was an old-timers nightmare. In 2000 I was asked why we weren't developing software using microsoft? Now, no one is surprised when we are not using Windows anymore, but I am quickly corrected, "Oh, you mean linux." 

So rather than looking at me as if I had three heads, now I only have two. I have been told the difference between Unix and Linux--but I never got it until the other day when our server was crashing. It seemed hardly possible, its a machine with seven hard drives, but as Nick our Unix guru at gti.net explained that during a drive rotation, the machine hiccupped at exactly the worst moment, the drive was being backed up sending her into a tailspin with a backup tape that may be damaged.

Nick explained that I need not worry. Even in the worst case scenario, the data on the Unix machine spills out like sand and can actually be put back together like an intricate puzzle. While, if it had been a Linux box, the data would be a clump of wet tissue paper--undecipherable, unrecoverable, dead as a door nail. 

Now, I get the difference.

When I explain my case to others, Linux and Windows folks-still both argue that Unix is not user-friendly and Unix developers are more expensive by the hour and harder to find. This translates to they act superior, like those of a caste who  are born with the gift of Parsal tongue. None deign to share their secret powers and indeed few ever crawl out of their rooms. 

And yet, these strange people need to work less to make their machines work better--and yes, they are proficient in their language---when it is your data and your business on the line, proficiency counts. 

When it is your plane going down, you don't want someone who just opened the manual waiting the flight "wizard prompt" to go through the steps one-by-one. In fact, you do the math, pay more by the hour, but it takes less time, lasts longer, and less crash endings. No worries, the server crash was turned out not to be as bad as initially thought (her rescue by the Parsal tongues is another tale).

Signed: Unix user, Free BSD flavor


Unix (officially trademarked as UNIX) is a computer operating system originally developed in the 1960s and 1970s by a group of AT&T employees at Bell Labs including Ken Thompson, Dennis Ritchie, and Douglas McIlroy. Today's Unix systems are split into various branches, developed over time by AT&T, as well as various commercial vendors and non-profit organizations.
The present owner of the trademark UNIX is The Open Group, an industry standards consortium. The rights to the Unix source code, however, are being challenged in a 2004 federal lawsuit, in which UNIX vendor SCO Group Inc. accused Novell of slander of title. Note the trademark owner uses the name UNIX, not Unix, which is sometimes used. The term UNIX is not an an acronym, but follows the early convention of naming computer systems in capital letters, such as ENIAC and MISTIC.
Only systems fully compliant with and certified to the Single UNIX Specification qualify as "UNIX" (others are called "Unix system-like" or "Unix-like").
During the late 1970s and early 1980s, Unix's influence in academic circles led to large-scale adoption (particularly of the BSD variant, originating from the University of California, Berkeley) of Unix by commercial startups, the most notable of which is Sun Microsystems. Today, in addition to certified Unix systems, Unix-like operating systems such as Linux and Mac OS X are commonly encountered.

Sometimes, Traditional Unix may be used to describe a Unix or an operating system that has the characteristics of either Version 7 Unix or UNIX System V.


Pages

Add to Google

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Categories

Powered by Movable Type 4.23-en
Loading...

About this Archive

This page is an archive of entries from October 2006 listed from newest to oldest.

December 2006 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.